elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Discuss anything you want.
Post Reply
User avatar
jade_vine
Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:25 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by jade_vine » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:05 am

MrCarmady wrote:I don't like the look of Perceval after downloading it recently, but will watch it soon; I know people who claim it's his best,
sup
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:51 am

elixir wrote:do u hate gus van sant or larry clark more
i haven't seen larry clark movies, i think gus van sant seems like the creepiest guy but i have no problem with the movies i've seen of his other than that they're mainly bad
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:54 am

If snapper watches a Larry Clark movie, his need to be outraged will take over almost immediately since Clark isn't interested in rose-colored glasses.
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
Epistemophobia
Posts: 29797
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:21 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Epistemophobia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:07 am

I love Gus.
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:19 am

B-Side wrote:If snapper watches a Larry Clark movie, his need to be outraged will take over almost immediately since Clark isn't interested in rose-colored glasses.
more in pointless excess that has nothing to do with what happens in real life ever anywhere despite what he claims, apparently
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:21 am

from what i've read

believe it or not, as incensed as watching young people fucking on screen makes me, nothing offends me more than bad filmmaking
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:24 am

snapper wrote:more in pointless excess that has nothing to do with what happens in real life ever anywhere despite what he claims, apparently
there's nothing in his films that is outside the realm of reality for many american teenagers
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:30 am

how many times have you murdered your grandparents and contracted AIDS
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:33 am

so wait these things not only have to happen in real life, but they have to be common?

jesus
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
MrCarmady
Posts: 4749
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:29 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by MrCarmady » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:43 pm

Kids is obvious and terrible, not too bothered about seeing any of Clark's other stuff. Only seen Drugstore Cowboy from Van Sant, definitely much more promising cinematically.
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:50 pm

MrCarmady wrote:Kids is obvious and terrible
no
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Trip » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:41 pm

jade_vine wrote:
sup
:up:
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:20 pm

B-Side wrote:so wait these things not only have to happen in real life, but they have to be common?

jesus
I feel like presenting them with the equivalent of the 60s educational movie sloganeering ie "THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR CHILDREN!" is kinda asinine. I hear from a lot of corners that's what Clark does. I don't have any prejudice against actually seeing the films, I just haven't gotten around to it.
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
wigwam
Posts: 2084
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:03 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by wigwam » Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:43 pm

he's never making moral judgements, he celebrates and empathizes with people who pretty much can't even do that for themselves or their peer group

his stuff since Ken Park also has a very warm humanity towards a few of the parents and their genuine connections with the kids which contrast sharply with the bad parents

plus his photography (and Lachman's in KP) is so immediate and tangible, he's really great, especially when collaborating with a good writer or co-director

also he banged Bijou Philips at age 64, major props brobro :up:
User avatar
Das
Posts: 16487
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:07 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Das » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:20 pm

Clark's interest is often in the humane - not nessecarily in the act of filming people fucking, but the tangible connection made by sex between people who don't really have another way of expressing those feelings.

As a side note, shame on Snapper for belittling Pasolini for how he uses sexuality - his entire filmography isn't Salo for fuck's sake. That aside, religious and social themes are often more central to his work than sexuality most of the time, athough sex is at the center of a number of his films, but certainly not in a 'seedy' way.
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Trip » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:51 pm

looove pasolini's sex and nudity
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
Boner M
Posts: 1324
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 9:39 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Boner M » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:15 pm

Those giant fake cocks at the end of Salo are terrifying
User avatar
elixir
Posts: 8655
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:48 am
Contact:

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by elixir » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:51 pm

"hear from a lot of corners" ughh

pasolini. there's an embarrassing blindspot.
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:34 am

Salo is one of my favourite films
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
Das
Posts: 16487
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:07 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Das » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:55 am

I hate it, it's really the only feature film Pasolini made I actively dislike.

But its one of the ones where his treatment of sexuality is actively seedy, that's intentional of course, central to give the film a more scathing tone of condemnation - in his other work, sexuality is treated with either a lightness (The Decameron), or imbued with a strong thematic relevance (Teorema).
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:43 am

Larry Clark doesn't strike me as a very empathetic filmmaker. Kids, in particular, comes off very critical. I mean, wasn't that one of Korine's biggest complaints about that film was that he thought Clark was far more critical than Korine intended? Korine would never treat his characters the way Clark does with his films. I'd be curious to hear BS's thoughts on Kids though. I'm not especially set in one position on the film, my feelings tend to be more mixed, so I can be moved on it, but right now my immediate reaction tends to be unfavorable.

I can see that Clark may have become a little less judgmental with his later films (especially with the help of Korine's hand again on Ken Park), but I felt Bully struck about the same kind of tone as Kids to me. His films also still feel very pervy and I just don't really see what I'm supposed to glean from closeups of some kid's crotch (as in Ken Park). But beyond all that, I just don't find him very insightful or a particularly dynamic artist (his films all look pretty bland to me), especially when he's compared to Korine.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:36 am

He's not as good as Korine, definitely, but I think he definitely is empathetic. I don't think he shows as much fondness for his characters as Korine does, and that probably makes his empathy a bit harder to glean, but like Korine, I don't think he's serving these kids up as a horror story for parents. It's been too long since I've seen Kids to defend it properly, but I remember finding it totally engrossing.
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
Das
Posts: 16487
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:07 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Das » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:33 am

Kids is both critical and empathetic of the figures within, Clark's not foolish, or idealistic enough to believe that Telly's totally unaware of the potential consequences of his actions, and of the moral character - but Clark also smartly realizes that the young man is short of judgement, and in a youthful way, feels like nothing can come down on him - and injects that into his character as well, as reckless as the behavior of the teenagers in Kids is - Clark relates to the logic (or lack thereof) behind the group's decisions, and isn't really terribly interested in moralizing, or preaching a lesson about what just occurred, it happens, and Clark lets the audience draw their own conclusion - he doesn't make monsters out of Casper, and Telly, even though what they did is clearly wrong.

He's not the artist Korine is in that regard at all - but that doesn't make him unsympathetic towards the people he portrays in his films.
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by B-Side » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:50 am

yeah
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
Shieldmaiden
Posts: 7523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Shieldmaiden » Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:13 pm

elixir wrote:Red Desert | Michaelangelo Antonioni | 1964 | [87]
Even as it somehow feels less "substantial." less of a weight than some of his others, this is still just magnificent and obviously gorgeous beyond belief. I knew about the colors going in, but not all the out of focus stuff. Also, honestly, there is some good (if droll) humor here, particularly in the shed (?) or whatever. Vitti is the best. Um, good comments. The truth is, while I sometimes enjoy, now and then, reading "analysis" of Antonioni's cinema, it's just a thing I really feel more than anything and find a lot of conclusions drawn to be like "oh" and like I've even read the dude's own comments on the film, and it makes sense, but thankfully film can't really be pared down that way and it's the experience of watching it that remains immeasurable. So in conclusion, fuck criticism.
Was it droll humor when the camera went up the walls during the laborers' meeting and followed the wires around? I heartily dislike all the analysis I've read about Antonioni. I'm not saying "they are wrong," or "I'm the only one who gets it," or anything stupid. But, yes, the experience is the thing, and I'll just go watch it again and forget all the talk. :)
Koridorius | Sharunas Bartas | 1994 | [74]
There's a scene where a kid is repeatedly pushed into this muddy puddle of sorts and this film kinda feels like that by rather than being miserablist it's hauntingly gorgeous and yet also matter-of-fact despite this attribute. It's just consistently engaging and ugh let's not use tone poem but um can I use mood piece but yeah that's how it exists, and the beauty of the close-up and Golubeva, and clearly I should watch more Bartas!
Did you think the kids were in the past? I'm glad you enjoyed this! A Casa is just like this, but more beautiful and mysterious, and sooo much sadder, so of course I love it.
Lazzaro felice - Cabin in the Sky - An Autumn Afternoon

Voyage | Female Gaze | MACBETH | Sokurov | Fassbinder | Greenaway | Denis | Sono | My Bookshelf
User avatar
wigwam
Posts: 2084
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:03 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by wigwam » Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:07 pm

Shieldmaiden wrote: I'll just go watch it again and forget all the talk. :)
:heart: i think ur a badass
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:50 pm

I feel like film analysis is catching a lot of flack in here. The reason people want to analyze Antonioni so much is because they love his films and they're so complex and powerful. It's not really so much about whether you agree with a given analysis or not. I find analysis interesting regardless of whether I agree with it, and I do a lot of it myself (especially on Antonioni), but not with the expectation that everyone will think I'm right, or that my interpretation is definitive. It's just a part of the culture of art and cinema to try and explore meanings through discussion and analysis, where a great work of art generates a large body of ideas that over time, helps canonize the greatness of that director and provides rich layers of thought for newcomers to encounter, react to, and reflect on with their own ideas. I love the vast scholarship on Antonioni's films precisely because it's an ongoing conversation and provides many vessels of meaning for me to take with me each time I revisit and encounter his work, searching and discovering new understandings and meanings. I still approach Antonioni from a purely visceral and emotional standpoint, but I don't think I do a disservice to those feelings by trying to articulate them, even though I might fail, as I am sure I often do. I still enjoy the effort.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Trip » Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:55 pm

no, fuck off
Please TRIP and Die
mystery meat
Posts: 193
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by mystery meat » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:12 pm

Antonioni films are really easy to badly analyze though. if anyone's read Seymour Chatman's book on him it's unbearably shitty. enough so that i wrote a 2500 piece on it, to emerge at some point in the near future.
User avatar
elixir
Posts: 8655
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:48 am
Contact:

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by elixir » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:52 pm

I'm not against film analysis, haha (the "fuck criticism" is wholly a joke). I just more wanted to emphasize "the visceral and emotional standpoint" of watching--and reflecting, and heck even articulating about (whether written or otherwise)--the film. You know I'd read anything you'd write Izzy (I've already read the thing on your blog) :D

I don't care for Kids, but I'll watch Bully at some point probably.
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:15 pm

I see. And thanks! But yes, I agree with you about the visceral aspect. That component can be under appreciated. Film-going shouldn't just be some cerebral exercise.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:15 pm

Trip wrote:no, fuck off
:(
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Shieldmaiden
Posts: 7523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Shieldmaiden » Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:40 pm

Izzy Black wrote:It's just a part of the culture of art and cinema to try and explore meanings through discussion and analysis, where a great work of art generates a large body of ideas that over time, helps canonize the greatness of that director and provides rich layers of thought for newcomers to encounter, react to, and reflect on with their own ideas.
All true, and I would normally agree wholeheartedly. It's not like I'm some anti-intellectual epistemophobe. I love to read about film, and don't get me started about film discussion! It's just that, in this particular case (Antonioni) I feel out of step with most of what I read. Or, to paraphrase: they're wrong, and I'm the only one who gets it. :P
Lazzaro felice - Cabin in the Sky - An Autumn Afternoon

Voyage | Female Gaze | MACBETH | Sokurov | Fassbinder | Greenaway | Denis | Sono | My Bookshelf
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:09 pm

mystery meat wrote:Antonioni films are really easy to badly analyze though. if anyone's read Seymour Chatman's book on him it's unbearably shitty. enough so that i wrote a 2500 piece on it, to emerge at some point in the near future.
This is very true. Most critics I encounter have no idea what Blow Up is about and resort to really surface conclusions. And the essay included with the Criterion of Identification of a Woman is dreadful. The critic completely misses the point of the film and makes some flat out ridiculous statements (he describes the excellent electronic score as "eurotrash" music that Antonioni was using ironically and mockingly, and says the film isn't in the class of his 'High Masterpieces,' which allegedly are theses about 'the human condition.' There's a lot wrong here, but to be fair, the essay actually isn't entirely worthless). On the other hand, Senses of Cinema has some nice pieces on Antonioni, but the emphasis on "spiritual isolation" I think is often read a little too much in Antonioni, along with the observation that his films are about the "inability to communicate." In the case of the latter, I think the problem really isn't so much a failure of communication as it is the irrelevance of communication in a modern world, that it serves its function as a solution to traditional problems rather than contemporary ones and is no longer relevant or effective. The question often isn't whether his characters can communicate, but it's rather, why bother? (Which in a lot of ways anticipates Bartas and Tarr, but in subtle gestures). In many cases, his characters simply prefer silence. Or, to be silent. (This is at least especially true of the men in his films and I think even Vittoria and Claudia. But at the same time, in Guiliana's case, the problem seems twofold; she does seem genuinely unable to articulate her neurosis, but this isn't her most pressing problem, since it's not as if articulating her feelings would help rid her of her condition.) In many ways, I certainly position myself against the orthodox perspective in regard to the Antonioni literature, which obviously affects how I evaluate his overall filmography. For instance, I think La Notte is arguably lesser Antonioni, Blow Up is one of his weakest films, Zabriskie Point is excellent, and that Beyond the Clouds and Identification of a Woman are major works rather than minor late works of an aging, out of touch auteur (I prefer them to Blow Up and La Notte).
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Shieldmaiden
Posts: 7523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Shieldmaiden » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:23 pm

Now, that was worth reading. :heart:
Lazzaro felice - Cabin in the Sky - An Autumn Afternoon

Voyage | Female Gaze | MACBETH | Sokurov | Fassbinder | Greenaway | Denis | Sono | My Bookshelf
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Trip » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:25 pm

Izzy Black wrote: :(
:heart:
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:38 pm

:)
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
mystery meat
Posts: 193
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by mystery meat » Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:53 pm

whether it's indifference to communication or inability, i do agree with the common analysis that his films are about the disjunction between internalized feelings and behavioral signifiers, or like that the surface of behavior isn't close to transparent. i think you're right in that a lot of his silences suggest the futility of rather than the failure to communicate. i think spiritual isolation way oversteps things, cuz i don't think Antonioni saw the 'modern condition' or whatever in such grandiloquent terms, and it's pretty eye-roll criticism to harp on that stuff (as if Antonioni wasn't also riveted by modernity while acknowledging its challenges).

i also love Zabriskie Point. the Chatman book makes the dumbest assessment of the film i've ever read and misconstrues all its abstract aesthetic choices and defamiliarization tactics as Antonioni's inability to understand American culture. booooo. also i think The Passenger is arguably his greatest, next to L'Avventura and L'Eclisse. Identification was probably the most challenging of the ones i've watched as far as my ability to comprehend/recall it. i'll have to give it another shot sometime.
User avatar
Shieldmaiden
Posts: 7523
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Shieldmaiden » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:03 pm

mystery meat wrote:also i think The Passenger is arguably his greatest, next to L'Avventura and L'Eclisse.
My top three, as well. I still have a few to see, though.
Lazzaro felice - Cabin in the Sky - An Autumn Afternoon

Voyage | Female Gaze | MACBETH | Sokurov | Fassbinder | Greenaway | Denis | Sono | My Bookshelf
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:20 pm

I agree with Izzy, isn't analysis the root of film discussion? Otherwise, why are we here? I don't want to have endlessly cyclical conversations on how nice the experience was; all movies deserve to be intellectualised even if you're just explaining how and why the experience may or may not have been "nice".
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
elixir
Posts: 8655
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:48 am
Contact:

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by elixir » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:21 pm

I don't think anyone really disagrees (generally speaking).
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:24 pm

Antonioni in particular is interesting for this because in a lot of ways his films discourage active emotional involvement and "immersion" and ask you to question why you are left disconnected from characters and events on screen. I'm My Fair Lady-ing one of my best friends who didn't like L'avventura because it "didn't move him", which imo is the film's objective - remove you from identification with characters and require that you identify with them as existential and social symbols. The ending becomes more powerful when Anna is "women", Sandro is "men" and both of them are "people".

He did really enjoy Zabriskie Point which baffled me because it's the closest I've gotten to really disliking an Antonioni.
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:32 pm

I agree with the communication problems thing, but I think Antonioni consistently creates an image of the world that exists relative to some past, idealised golden age or romanticism where emotions and introspection meant something, people and personalities weren't expendable, emotional connection was the objective of human interaction and art had a role in peoples' lives. He thinks that the processes that developed this 'new world' are failures in communication or integrity or 'humanity' but that the end result is the irrelevance of communication, a society where everyone lives in their own little bubbles and can only interact with brief, indifferent and accidental emotional violence.

This gives his entire filmography, but especially the Trilogy as a unit, a sort of creeping dread and suspense. They're like a horror film where the monster is Communication Failure and it stalks the characters, getting closer and closer until it overtakes them (which it does in different ways at the end of each film).
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:14 pm

mystery meat wrote:whether it's indifference to communication or inability, i do agree with the common analysis that his films are about the disjunction between internalized feelings and behavioral signifiers, or like that the surface of behavior isn't close to transparent. i think you're right in that a lot of his silences suggest the futility of rather than the failure to communicate. i think spiritual isolation way oversteps things, cuz i don't think Antonioni saw the 'modern condition' or whatever in such grandiloquent terms, and it's pretty eye-roll criticism to harp on that stuff (as if Antonioni wasn't also riveted by modernity while acknowledging its challenges).
Exactly! People forget that Antonioni was coming from a place of utter fascination and curiosity. This isn't to say that he didn't have concerns, but his concerns were motivated more by confusion and perplexity than idealism. Indeed, it's for much of this reason that Antonioni distanced himself from the socialist realism of his early career and the post-war Italian cinema of his predecessors. With L'Avventura, he hung up the ideology to step back and observe. He became a listener and a watcher rather than an activist. This isn't to say that his 'alienation trilogy' isn't motivated by Marxist concerns and considerations, because I think Antonioni in a sense remained a committed Marxist for his entire career (which is also to say that I don't think he ever stopped being an economist or putting his economics degree to use), but the difference is that his middle and late work employ a Marxist critique from a purely dialectical standpoint rather than a theoretical one that advocates the Marxist positive call for social change. This is, perhaps, because he was skeptical that such a change was possible or that it could be achieved through Marxist type revolutions, and moreover, because he was skeptical that a purely Marxist critique was at all sufficient to diagnose the problems of modernity. In other words, he identified a particular social problem with his camera and the tools of traditional Marxist analysis, but refused to engage in neorealist idealism because he was willing to engage the wonders of technology and capitalism.
Critics of Identification of a Woman think the ending is Antonioni's whacky late-career attempt at European arthouse ambiguity, but in reality, it's a reflection of the fact that Antonioni had been trying to make a science fiction film his entire career, as Niccolò qua Antonioni's stand-in tries to do in the film, and which Antonioni practically achieved twice with L'Eclisse and Il deserto rosso). It's true the space ship in the ending suggests a kind of escape from the modern world, but it's an escape only made possible by technological wonder, and rather than mere escape, it reflects, like 2001, a form of Nietzschean transcending or overcoming of modernity's perils and by utilizing its very resources. This is consistent with Antonioni's remarks throughout his career, which dates even to his speech at the 1960 Cannes premiere of L'Avventura where he said we must come to terms with modernity by evolving and relinquishing our impoverished traditional moral concepts. The problem isn't modernity so much as it is our failure to adapt to it. The call isn't for a revolutionary change of society and its institutions from the outside so to accommodate the inner needs of woman/man, but a call to change woman/man from the inside so as to cope with an inevitably progressive society. The responsibility falls on us to adjust. If it's a sink or swim world, then we must learn to swim. The ending of Identification of a Woman poetically envisions just such an evolution.
In the end, I do think the standard line that Antonioni's films deal with alienation and isolation is correct, but the problem with using that as a kind of catch-all criticism (or 'eye-roll' criticism as you adequately describe it) is that it doesn't tell the whole story. Antonioni's thoughts on the matter and his relationship to modernity were far more complicated than that. There's alienation and the erosion of traditional conceptions of romantic love, and even personal responsibility, but there is also utter awe at the (post)industrial majesty of modernity. In a way, this is a somewhat postmodern attitude toward modernity (Jia Zhangke's Still Life also displays this schizophrenic attitude toward alienation, capitalism, industrialization, and modernity; it presents a developing industrial world as at once both alienating and a marvelous modern spectacle by deconstructing the line between realism and science-fiction).
mystery meat wrote:i also love Zabriskie Point. the Chatman book makes the dumbest assessment of the film i've ever read and misconstrues all its abstract aesthetic choices and defamiliarization tactics as Antonioni's inability to understand American culture. booooo. also i think The Passenger is arguably his greatest, next to L'Avventura and L'Eclisse. Identification was probably the most challenging of the ones i've watched as far as my ability to comprehend/recall it. i'll have to give it another shot sometime.
The Passenger is excellent. It's not my favorite, but that's no mark against the film. As for Zabriskie Point, yes, too often critics gathered Antonioni's decisions as completely unintentional and without self-awareness. Antonioni was aware as anyone that he was an outsider looking in.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Trip » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:26 pm

I have the chance to see Blow-Up and Zabriskie Point back to back during MIFF, both 35mm. It'll be the first time for the latter.
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:27 pm

I'll be seeing L'Avventura with the new 35 mm print. I'm hoping Janus releases the poster for sale to the public and CC picks up rights to the Blu-Ray.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:35 pm

snapper wrote:I agree with the communication problems thing, but I think Antonioni consistently creates an image of the world that exists relative to some past, idealised golden age or romanticism where emotions and introspection meant something, people and personalities weren't expendable, emotional connection was the objective of human interaction and art had a role in peoples' lives. He thinks that the processes that developed this 'new world' are failures in communication or integrity or 'humanity' but that the end result is the irrelevance of communication, a society where everyone lives in their own little bubbles and can only interact with brief, indifferent and accidental emotional violence.
Yes. I actually consider Antonioni's middle period as a polemic, an attack on the reactionary/conservative ideals of neorealism. He was in dialogue with his predecessors as much as he was in dialogue with himself on this, though. Obviously, I don't think this is explicit or the main thing going on, but I think his films have this kind of effect and Antonioni clearly sensed the tension between these two worldviews or sensibilities.
snapper wrote:This gives his entire filmography, but especially the Trilogy as a unit, a sort of creeping dread and suspense. They're like a horror film where the monster is Communication Failure and it stalks the characters, getting closer and closer until it overtakes them (which it does in different ways at the end of each film).
It's true. His films are very pessimistic in this way, shrouded in a foreboding sense of doom, disappointment, and failure, even flirting with an air of nihilism, but where he rises above it is that I think he genuinely thought the modern world was as beautiful as it was ugly.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
snapper
Posts: 12232
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: NZ

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by snapper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:51 pm

Well, he shoots it like an alien landscape. His films are gorgeous. I think his thesis is that it is modern, but it isn't 'the world' any longer.
Latest notable first-time viewings:

* The Sun in a Net / Uher
** The Seashell and the Clergyman / Dulac
The Tales of Beatrix Potter / Mills
* A Flood in Ba'ath Country / Amiralay
Times and Winds / Erdem
Most Beautiful Island / Asensio
* Japanese Girls Never Die / Matsui
* Birth Certificate / Różewicz
Bush Mama / Gerima
** Paris Is Burning / Livingston


TWEET1 | TWEET2 | FACE | BOXD | TUMBL1 | TUMBL2
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:55 pm

But in the end I do think Antonioni's films are ultimately pessimistic (and depressing) because he rarely shows the successful adjustment his characters need in order to cope with modernity, and even rather shows their explicit failure in this task. I think L'Eclisse's ending is the greatest example of this and arguably his darkest film. (But take my interpretation with a grain of salt; Antonioni himself believes L'Eclisse has a hopeful ending, that Vittoria somehow achieves an overcoming. Needless to say, I'm not convinced, but I intend to revisit the film on projection soon to reassess the matter.) He's not an outright miserablist though because he does provide gestures or glimpses at the possibility of successful adjustment to modern living (depending on how you interpret the the beach scene and ending of Il deserto rosso, and the endings of L'Avventura, La Notte, and Identification of a Woman). For my money, L'Avventura has the most promising/hopeful conclusion on this front.

But he's still pretty dark given that it seems we're only given hints at a possibility, and it's often a dream, a fleeting moment, or an illusion. We never see the actual resolve, and in most cases, we're completely denied it (The Passenger, L'Eclisse, Blow Up, Zabriskie Point), leaving us only with emptiness and decay.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
User avatar
Izzy Black
Posts: 2982
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:10 am

Re: elixir's film journal, and nothing more...

Post by Izzy Black » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:57 pm

snapper wrote:Well, he shoots it like an alien landscape. His films are gorgeous. I think his thesis is that it is modern, but it isn't 'the world' any longer.
Absolutely. It's a strange, new world. We're just visitors passing through, out of place, looking for home.
Recent films:

See my latest blog entry: Run the Jewels’ “Close Your Eyes” and Police Brutality

По́мните Катю...
Post Reply