The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Discuss anything you want.
Post Reply
User avatar
Wolfy
Posts: 37391
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Wolfy » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:56 am

Armin wrote: Or, we can just make an all time list.
Again?!
Ok.
User avatar
plain
Posts: 17300
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by plain » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:06 pm

If more people want to do it, I'll send out a pm to everyone, unless Rdog wants to run it again.
User avatar
B-Side
Posts: 50661
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:14 am

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by B-Side » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:09 pm

Wolfy wrote: Again?!
Ok.
Only if we can get more people to participate.
no longer on hiatus from movies(!)

next projection | twitter | frames within frames
| letterboxd
User avatar
Wolfy
Posts: 37391
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Wolfy » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:21 pm

Sexiest stars of all-time list!
User avatar
TheAsianSensation
Posts: 5482
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:12 am

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by TheAsianSensation » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:26 pm

Wolfy wrote:Sexiest stars of all-time list!
Dammit, then I'd have to participate.
User avatar
ribbon
Posts: 45363
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:14 am
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by ribbon » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:28 pm

I'm just jumping in without backreading - but I'd be game for an all-time list.
User avatar
ribbon
Posts: 45363
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:14 am
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by ribbon » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:29 pm

getrhythm wrote:I'm just jumping in without backreading - but I'd be game for an all-time list.
Or a 90's.
User avatar
plain
Posts: 17300
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by plain » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:30 pm

90's would be less predictable I think.
User avatar
Dizzle Sizzle
Posts: 5313
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Parting the clouds in the sky.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Dizzle Sizzle » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:35 pm

I very much approve of the top 10, with the exception of The New World. Didn't really do it for me.
"What if there isn't a tomorrow? There wasn't one today."
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Trip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:40 pm

boo lists
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
Dizzle Sizzle
Posts: 5313
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Parting the clouds in the sky.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Dizzle Sizzle » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:41 pm

plainview wrote:If more people want to do it, I'll send out a pm to everyone, unless Rdog wants to run it again.
I'm game, considering I forgot to hand in my list for this one.
"What if there isn't a tomorrow? There wasn't one today."
User avatar
Chip Chip
Posts: 20440
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: Not Nebraska

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Chip Chip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:27 pm

Dizzle Sizzle wrote:I very much approve of the top 10, with the exception of The New World. Didn't really do it for me.
I hate you
User avatar
Eleven
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Eleven » Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:33 pm

woo lists
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Trip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:34 pm

boo eleven
the poster, love the number
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
Dizzle Sizzle
Posts: 5313
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Parting the clouds in the sky.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Dizzle Sizzle » Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:48 pm

Chip Chip wrote:I hate you
Let's not make this about us. It's about the list(s).
"What if there isn't a tomorrow? There wasn't one today."
User avatar
plain
Posts: 17300
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by plain » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:23 pm

I sent rdog a message concerning the 90's list.
User avatar
Dizzle Sizzle
Posts: 5313
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm
Location: Parting the clouds in the sky.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Dizzle Sizzle » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:25 pm

plainview wrote:I sent rdog a message concerning the 90's list.
Excellent.
"What if there isn't a tomorrow? There wasn't one today."
User avatar
Vasco
Posts: 4440
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Vasco » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:36 pm

I don't remember where I found this, but I think it's funny.


Top ten reasons not to list things:

10. It implies self-importance and conceit.
9. Hardly anybody reads your individual opinion anyway.
8. Opinions differ, so do lists.
7. They’re too subjective on one hand, yet too objective on the other.
6. They take too long to compile.
5. Even the most knowledgeable film critic’s list can be poo-pooed if someone dismisses it as “just their opinion”.
4. Often one item on the list is just space-filling. Like this one.
3. As the list goes on the items become more and more predictable/repetitive.
2. More and more predictable/repetitive.
1. Citizen Kane.
User avatar
Alice
Posts: 38293
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:26 am
Location: down the rabbithole

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Alice » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:57 pm

Monsieur Red wrote:Eh, I'm surprised that The Departed didn't crack 100.
I'm disappointed. I know a lot of people don't like it but I do and I thought it would have at least gotten in at the bottom.
Mod Hip
Posts: 14065
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Mod Hip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:18 pm

getrhythm wrote:Oh, Fellowship. The only one I like.
Glad to learn I'm not alone in this :)

I tried to convince myself the other two were good...

...didn't work.

They have their merits, though.

EDIT: List is already complete? Man, it's impossible to keep up with the threads on here and maintain some semblance of a real life. Pretty excellent to see The New World and Punch-Drunk Love in the top 10 with Adaptation close behind (also nice to see Kill Bill up there but that goes without saying)... and I'll concur with those surprised that The Departed didn't make the list at all. If my post count is deemed high enough by the time another one of these gets moving, I'd be game for an all-time list.
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:06 pm

Rdog wrote:
The Royal Tenenbaums- Directed by Wes Anderson


11 votes
points- 49
Hate this fucking movie.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 70527
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Trip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:09 pm

dreiser wrote:
Hate this fucking movie.
Avatar
Please TRIP and Die
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:16 pm

Rdog wrote:Number 18
The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou- Directed by Wes Anderson
votes- 12
points- 56
swan swan h wrote:Who's picking these films?
I give up.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
User avatar
Eleven
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Eleven » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:24 pm

I'm sure Wes Anderson is bemoaning your lack of wit and/or whimsy at this exact moment.
User avatar
Vasco
Posts: 4440
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Vasco » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:28 pm

dreiser wrote:


I give up.
Now you know what we feel like when we see your ratings. :D
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:29 pm

Eleven wrote:I'm sure Wes Anderson is bemoaning your lack of wit and/or whimsy at this exact moment.
That's right... I am completely lacking a sense of humor because I don't like WAnderson.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
User avatar
Eleven
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Eleven » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:37 pm

dreiser wrote:That's right... I am completely lacking a sense of humor because I don't like WAnderson.
Of course not. I'm sure there are plenty of other reasons why you completely lack a sense of humor.

EDIT: Although anyone with those ratings can't be altogether lacking a sense of humor.
User avatar
BSB Soundsystem
Posts: 1674
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:39 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by BSB Soundsystem » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:39 pm

plainview wrote:I sent rdog a message concerning the 90's list.
gattaca greatest film!
User avatar
MadMan
Posts: 10582
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: RT FOREVER
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by MadMan » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:43 pm

Monsieur Red wrote:Life Aquatic > Tenenbaums

Image
Yep.

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford barely missed making my list. Amelie and The Royal Tenenbaums were featured on there, as both rule. Even though Rushmore and The Life Aquatic are better Wes Anderson movies.

Spirited Away is another one I voted for, and the only animated movie to ever crack my Top 20. But I still have much animated movies to see, I suppose.

Memento and Children of Men are truly amazing movies. Naturally this results in people going "Eh" here, so I'm not surprised :P Both of course made my list, so blame me for their high placement.

The Life Aquatic rules. Anyone who doesn't think otherwise is a stinkin' commie. Yeah, you heard me. Inglourious Basterds is great and all, but it didn't crack my Top 10.

My thoughts on FOTR have already been stated. A Serious Man is flat out brilliant, of course-one of the Coens' best, really. Adapation is another fantastic one that was too awesome for the Oscar people to handle, so they failed to nominate it for Best Picture.

The New World is good, but it shouldn't have made this list. Vol. 2>Vol. 1 when it comes to Kill Bill, but Basterds is better than both of them.

No Country for Old Men is great, sure-but its not better than A Serious Man. Barely missed my list, though.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is my #1 of 2004, so hell yeah it cracked my list. Excellent movie.

And wow, the only one I voted for that didn't make the Top 100 was The Proposition, which people either didn't see or they failed to realize that its one of the best westerns of all time. More than likely its the latter :P
This Is My Blog. There Are Many Like It But This One Is Mine
Shitty Film Thread
Follow Me On Twitter If You Aren't Doing So Already
The MadMan Reserved 31 Seats
"I think its time we discuss your, uh....philosophy of drug use as it relates to artistic endeavor." -Naked Lunch (1991)
User avatar
Fist
Posts: 16766
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Fist » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:04 pm

MadMan wrote: The New World is good, but it shouldn't have made this list.
:|
I Watch Films, But...
In a word, I think that, far from favoring directors’ formal inventiveness, widescreen, instead, stifles it. It is, I’m more and more persuaded, if not the only, at least the main culprit for the expressive poverty of the image today. - Eric Rohmer
Vimeo / / / Flickr
Mod Hip
Posts: 14065
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Mod Hip » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:40 pm

MadMan wrote:The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford barely missed making my list.
The only list it deserves to be on is 'crappiest crap of all crap... that somehow manages to at least look pretty.'
MadMan wrote:Memento and Children of Men are truly amazing movies.
I'm in agreement with Reservoir Dog in that Memento is lame and a gimmick. Children of Men... well, it conflicts me. It's technically astounding in many ways, features an incredibly compelling storyline with a perfect ending (yes!) and on top of that you've got great acting talent and a killer soundtrack... but somehow at times it just feels like it misses the mark. I know I'm completely contradicting myself... maybe I was just in a funk the last few times I viewed it.
MadMan wrote:The Life Aquatic rules. Anyone who doesn't think otherwise is a stinkin' commie.
Life Aquatic is okay. I need to rewatch it... but I'm pretty darn sure I'll still think it's just okay. Even if I like it better the second time 'round... it has Cate Blanchett so there's not much hope for it. Also, I'm a stinkin' commie.
MadMan wrote:No Country for Old Men is great
Still don't get why the world went nuts for that turd (and I typically love the Coens as much as the next person).
MadMan wrote:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is my #1 of 2004, so hell yeah it cracked my list. Excellent movie.
*begins to go with the flow* I always want to not like Eternal Sunshine because everyone else loves it and agreeing sucks... but every time I watch it I feel like my eyes are deepthroating my brain.
MadMan wrote:And wow, the only one I voted for that didn't make the Top 100 was The Proposition, which people either didn't see or they failed to realize that its one of the best westerns of all time. More than likely its the latter :P
I do really need to get around to that'un.
User avatar
MadMan
Posts: 10582
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: RT FOREVER
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by MadMan » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:07 pm

Skillet wrote:[The only list it deserves to be on is 'crappiest crap of all crap... that somehow manages to at least look pretty.'
That's like, your opinion, man :P
I'm in agreement with Reservoir Dog in that Memento is lame and a gimmick. Children of Men... well, it conflicts me. It's technically astounding in many ways, features an incredibly compelling storyline with a perfect ending (yes!) and on top of that you've got great acting talent and a killer soundtrack... but somehow at times it just feels like it misses the mark. I know I'm completely contradicting myself... maybe I was just in a funk the last few times I viewed it.
Memento isn't lame, nor is it a gimmick. If that's the case, then there are plenty of movies that could be considered gimmicks that receive far more love and praise. I don't take that as a valid criticism. As for Children of Men, I'm fine with not everything thinking its great, as there are some elements that certainly cause people to think less of it. So fair enough.
Life Aquatic is okay. I need to rewatch it... but I'm pretty darn sure I'll still think it's just okay. Even if I like it better the second time 'round... it has Cate Blanchett so there's not much hope for it. Also, I'm a stinkin' commie.
Haha, yeah I know that most people don't think highly of The Life Aquatic, from Ebert to other posters. *Reports Skillet* ;)
Still don't get why the world went nuts for that turd (and I typically love the Coens as much as the next person).
:?: Because its, um, a great movie that features expert performances and makes you think? Sure they've made better movies, but I was perfectly fine with that winning Best Picture. Even though its not even my #1 of 2007 currently (that would be Gone Baby Gone).
*begins to go with the flow* I always want to not like Eternal Sunshine because everyone else loves it and agreeing sucks... but every time I watch it I feel like my eyes are deepthroating my brain.
Makes sense....I guess....heh. Still, I'm surprised that I like it so much-I thought that the romantic elements would be annoying, but they work really well. Its truly a rom-com/drama contained with a sci-fi film, which is quite interesting to me.
I do really need to get around to that'un.
Hopefully you do, as its a favorite of mine as well. Also I rather like your avatar-Blacula is a 70s cult classic.
Magic Fister wrote:
:|
The last act drags, a lot. The ending goes on, and on, and on.....what the hell was the point of that? Otherwise, a fine movie and a good introduction for me to Maliack. I will watch more of his films.
This Is My Blog. There Are Many Like It But This One Is Mine
Shitty Film Thread
Follow Me On Twitter If You Aren't Doing So Already
The MadMan Reserved 31 Seats
"I think its time we discuss your, uh....philosophy of drug use as it relates to artistic endeavor." -Naked Lunch (1991)
User avatar
Vasco
Posts: 4440
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Vasco » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:16 pm

MadMan wrote: The New World is good, but it shouldn't have made this list.
MadMan wrote:The last act drags, a lot. The ending goes on, and on, and on.....
MadMan wrote: That's like, your opinion, man
Absolutely! :D
User avatar
Armin
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:53 pm
Location: Flashing through time

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Armin » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:18 pm

I don't get it, why shouldn't it have made the list? If enough people voted for it then it deserves it and it really should be on the list.
"I'd prostitute my talents if it would further my cause, steal if there was no way out, kill my friends or anyone else if it would help my art."
Letterboxd.
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:32 pm

Rdog wrote:There were a lot of votes for Kill Bill.
Makes sense to me.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
User avatar
Wolfy
Posts: 37391
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Wolfy » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:48 pm

TheAsianSensation wrote: Dammit, then I'd have to participate.
What do you think of this list?

Warning boobies!
http://www.gq.com/women/photos/25-sexie ... -slideshow
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:51 pm

Eleven wrote:
Of course not. I'm sure there are plenty of other reasons why you completely lack a sense of humor.

EDIT: Although anyone with those ratings can't be altogether lacking a sense of humor.
I laughed; well played.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
swan swan h

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by swan swan h » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:53 pm

This list sucks.
User avatar
Rdog
Posts: 31308
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Subspace Highway
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Rdog » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:54 pm

swan swan h wrote:This list sucks.
your face. Kill Bill is in the top ten. Doesn't that make you happy. :D
Way cooler than Wil
User avatar
dreiser
Posts: 16193
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Location: At the Great Northern Hotel w/ you know who.

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by dreiser » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:58 pm

I tallied seven films all told on the list. These were the exceptions:

Fog of War
Chicago
In the Bedroom

Obviously, I knew the musical would never make it, but I had hopes for the other two. Especially Fog.
"I hate the dark, the sharks liars. And the stems of cherry..."

Like Someone in Love (Kiarostami, 2012) 4/10
Killing Them Softly (Dominik, 2012) 2/10
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (Pal/Levin, 1962) 6/10
The Dark Past (Mate', 1948) 7/10
New Rose Hotel (Ferrara, 1998) 3/10
swan swan h

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by swan swan h » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:02 am

Rdog wrote:
your face. Kill Bill is in the top ten. Doesn't that make you happy. :D
It doesn't make up for the fact that there's not enough Russian and Romanian films.
User avatar
Rdog
Posts: 31308
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Subspace Highway
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Rdog » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:04 am

swan swan h wrote:
It doesn't make up for the fact that there's not enough Russian and Romanian films.
Sorry. I just posted what the people voted.
Way cooler than Wil
User avatar
LEAVES
Posts: 15564
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:31 pm
Location: LEAVES come from TREES

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by LEAVES » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:07 am

The next time you want your own top 100, make your own top 100.
swan swan h

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by swan swan h » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:09 am

LEAVES wrote:The next time you want your own top 100, make your own top 100.
I'll think about that LEAVES when I decide to start making useless lists of information.
User avatar
ribbon
Posts: 45363
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:14 am
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by ribbon » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:10 am

Only two of mine didn't make it:
Brand Upon the Brain! & Wonder Boys
swan swan h

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by swan swan h » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:10 am

Rdog wrote:
Sorry. I just posted what the people voted.
Not your fault people have no taste. Not your fault. In a civilized world, we'd all watch Kiarostami and Tarr 24 hours a day. :)
User avatar
ribbon
Posts: 45363
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:14 am
Contact:

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by ribbon » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:11 am

swan swan h wrote:I'll think about that LEAVES when I decide to start making useless lists of information.
Useless how? If they're useless to you, don't read them. Some people enjoy them, get recommendations from them, etc.
User avatar
LEAVES
Posts: 15564
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:31 pm
Location: LEAVES come from TREES

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by LEAVES » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:12 am

swan swan h wrote:Not your fault people have no taste. Not your fault. In a civilized world, we'd all watch Kiarostami and Tarr 24 hours a day. :)
How is it a matter of taste? If someone hasn't seen a film, then they can't vote for it, and if not enough people vote for it, it is no more means that they didn't like it than that they haven't seen it, so stop crying.
swan swan h wrote:I'll think about that LEAVES when I decide to start making useless lists of information.
Your posts of useless whining are halfway there. You've already listed Tarr and Kiarostami for no apparent reason.
User avatar
Fist
Posts: 16766
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by Fist » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:16 am

swan swan h wrote: I'll think about that LEAVES when I decide to start making useless lists of information.
Why are you still here?
I Watch Films, But...
In a word, I think that, far from favoring directors’ formal inventiveness, widescreen, instead, stifles it. It is, I’m more and more persuaded, if not the only, at least the main culprit for the expressive poverty of the image today. - Eric Rohmer
Vimeo / / / Flickr
swan swan h

Re: The 100 Best Films of the 2000's: A Corrierino Consensus

Post by swan swan h » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:19 am

LEAVES wrote:Your posts of useless whining are halfway there. You've already listed Tarr and Kiarostami for no apparent reason.
Wow. I mean wow. Do you take ever word I post seriously? I got a nice lime green pinto I could sell you for an easy $100. Want it?
Post Reply